![Risk.net](https://nginx.stage.bb8-risk.uk3.amazee.io/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
SEC criticised for belt-and-braces ban on volume-based pricing
Legal experts question need for rules to prevent firms disguising agency trades as proprietary
![Lots of locks Lots of locks](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/2023-11/Lots-of-locks.jpg.webp?itok=Ta-8HVpE)
Legal experts say the US Securities and Exchange Commission has included unnecessary and duplicative anti-evasion measures in its proposed ban on exchanges offering volume-based transaction pricing.
The proposed rule would forbid exchanges from offering preferential prices for brokers that submit large volumes of agency trades on behalf of clients, but would still allow volume-based pricing for proprietary trades. An exchange that offers volume-based pricing on proprietary orders would have to
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Former NY Fed chief calls for overhaul of discount window
Dudley’s proposed changes include prepositioning collateral, cutting costs of secondary credit facility
Trends in regulatory enforcement in the age of compliance angst
Legal and compliance experts discuss the changing shape of regulatory enforcement and how financial institutions are adapting to a shift in approach
US climate guidance stokes debate over defining material risks
Banks welcome flexibility, but it could lead to big divergence on climate risk management
Levelling the playing field for stablecoins
Regulatory asymmetries are a barrier to innovation in digital payments
Review of 2023: A hard road to a soft landing
Banks and regulators were caught in the crosswinds of the fight against inflation
Climate capital in the balance as EBA rejects green risk weights
European regulator suggests climate change must be factored into existing risk categories
FRTB could put Indian banks at competitive disadvantage
Simplified approach could leave local banks with higher capital charges than foreign branches